Rick-Brick
Extended Paper Review — Interdisciplinary Model Design to Preserve Novelty

Executive Summary

This article is designed to select and explain “recent papers” posted on arXiv and similar platforms between the day after the previous publication date and today (at most the past few days), as of JST 2026-04-15, across 10 expanded areas (robotics, autonomy, psychology/cognition, economics, life/drug-discovery AI, educational engineering, management, computational social science, financial engineering, energy/climate, and space). However, in response to this request, based on our browsing results, we could not confirm and finalize “specific recent papers” in each area (at least 5 per area) that correspond to the specified time window (2026-04-?? to 2026-04-15) using arXiv’s Submitted/final update dates as evidence. Therefore, we are currently unable to write a finalized version that meets the requirements (at least 5 papers, explanations of at least 700 characters per paper, total article length of at least 7000 characters, strict adherence to date constraints, and comprehensive coverage of individual paper URLs in sources). First, please confirm when your “previous publication date” was (JST) and determine the desired upper/lower bounds of the target period. Once those are confirmed, we will conduct at least 5 searches per area, extract only the most recent postings, and produce an article exceeding 7000 characters in the specified format.

Important: Why this article cannot be finalized for this request (due to unmet requirements)

In this request, you clearly specified that we should not select papers older than one week from “the day after the previous publication date up to today (2026-04-15)” and that we must always verify arXiv’s posting date (Submitted) or the final update date. However, with our browsing, while we can confirm the existence of category-specific “pastweek” pages, we have not been able to reach the point of collecting “individual papers that strictly match a specified date range” such as 2026-04-13 to 2026-04-15 by checking the Submitted/updated dates on each individual paper page. In addition, while some pages that appear to be candidates for recent papers besides arXiv were mixed in, the request requires the “individual paper and presentation URLs,” and because of the date constraints, inferring from summary sites does not meet the requirements.

As a result, we cannot satisfy the following—especially among the requirements:

  • We cannot finalize having at least 5 papers (across multiple domains) based on the specified date constraints
  • We cannot explain each paper’s main results with at least 700 characters, including confirming the abstract/main results
  • We cannot produce a finalized write-up of 7000 characters or more (including numerical details, comparisons, and limitations for each paper)
  • We cannot add the required number of individual URLs for each paper to sources (this time, individual URL collection is incomplete)

Next confirmation needed (one question for you)

What was the previous publication date (JST, YYYY-MM-DD)?

  • If the previous publication date was 2026-04-13, then the target period is 2026-04-14 to 2026-04-15 (2 days)
  • If the previous publication date was 2026-04-11, then the target period is 2026-04-12 to 2026-04-15 (4 days)

The range changes strictly depending on this value. Unless this is determined, we cannot realize “strict adherence to the date constraints.”

Execution plan after confirmation (proceeding in accordance with the requirements)

Once the previous publication date is known, we will do the following:

  • For each of the expanded 10 domains, extract arXiv submissions within the specified period from the category-specific “new arrivals,” confirm the Submitted/updated dates on each paper page, and filter accordingly
  • Change search keywords for each domain and perform at least 5 searches (per the request requirements)
  • Select at least 5 items from multiple domains based on importance and attention
  • For each paper, confirm the authors/affiliations, background and the question being addressed, the proposed method, major results (benchmark names and specific numbers), and its significance and limitations, and provide an explanation of at least 700 characters
  • Provide a transdisciplinary discussion and a reference table across the entire article, with a total length exceeding 7000 characters
  • Add all URLs of Markdown links in the本文 to sources (duplicates are unnecessary, but leaving any empty is not allowed)

References

TitleInformation SourceURL
X-raying the arXiv: A Large-Scale Analysis of arXiv Submissions’ Source FilesarXivhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11385
arXiv cs.RO past week listingarXivhttps://arxiv.org/list/cs.RO/pastweek
arXiv q-bio past week listingarXivhttps://arxiv.org/list/q-bio/pastweek
arXiv econ past week listingarXivhttps://arxiv.org/list/econ/pastweek
Daily arXivDailyarxivhttps://www.dailyarxiv.jp/

This article was automatically generated by LLM. It may contain errors.